Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13,270
Voight v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff: Matthew Steven Voight
Defendant: Wisconsin Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAMPLEY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: TOMMY LAMPLEY
Defendant: BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMISSIONER OF I.D.O.C., KYLE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentilini v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant: Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff: David Alan Gentilini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Householder v. Jordan et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff: Matthew Householder
Defendant: Scott Jordan, Cookie Crews and Sgt. Jimo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reza v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner: Matthew Reza
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hedrick v. Morrsey et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant: Patrick Morrsey, William K. Marshell, III, Shelby O. Searls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Tassin v. USA
as 24-11467
Petitioner: MATTHEW TASSIN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Soliz v. Nueces County
as 24-40353
Plaintiff: Jesus Soliz
Defendant: Nueces County, Armar Correctional Healthcare Services, Roberto Cano and others
Dewayne
as 3:2024cv02980
Plaintiff: Matthews Dewayne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonning v. Clifford
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff: Amy Rose Bonning
Defendant: Matthew Clifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?