Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2022ct03391
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Shannon
Defendant:
Mrs. Rodriguez, Dr. Amir Firzoui, Mrs. Carlock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pierce v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2020cv01755
Defendant:
Mr. Rodriguez, Ms. Thibeault, Thibeault and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv50413
Defendant:
Sgt. Mrs. Rodriguez, Mrs. Russell, Mrs. Heferfinger and others
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales Cruz v. Rodriguez
as 6:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Humberto Rosales Cruz
Defendant:
Dr. Mrs. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. O'Sullivan et al
as 3:2018cv00582
Defendant:
Mr. Rodriguez, Harold Clark and Jim O'Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Altonio Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sasaki v. Inch et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Defendant:
David J. Bruce, Walter Williams, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Sasaki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv03043
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Williams
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch , Travis Bragg , Ian Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
