Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Cuevas-Ramos
as 3:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Javier J. Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Luis Cuevas-Ramos, Carmen Ramona Natal-Perez, Edgardo Luis Cuevas-Natal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Lambert Airport Police et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Clint Phillips, III
Defendant:
Lambert Airport Police, Lambert International Airport and Abraham Natale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo-Rodriguez v. Cuevas-Natal
as 3:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Javier J Acevedo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edgardo Luis Cuevas-Natal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Neely et al
as 7:2023cv01025
Petitioner:
Naomi Natal Haynes
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NATAL
as 2:2023cv00447
In Re:
ANGEL NATAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jean Germain v. William Beeman
as 22-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN BERNARD GERMAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM BEEMAN, RN, HOWARD LEE COOK, Dr., JOHN DOE, Dr. and others
Jones v. USP Yazoo Health Service's et al
as 3:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones
Defendant:
USP Yazoo Health Service's, Mrs. Parker, Ms. Brown and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00970
Defendant:
Sgt. Bower, Lt. Trevethan, Dr. Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mac Lean v. Bondi et al
as 9:2020cv80997
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Marci Rex, Reid Scott and others
Plaintiff:
John Arthur Mac Lean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICTOR v. FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00286
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COUNSELOR LOU, COMMISSIONER LOHR and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
