Cases 1 - 10 of 950
Nguyen v. Bergami
as 3:2024cv01601
Petitioner:
Xuan Nguyen
Respondent:
Thomas Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Van v. Suprovici et al
as 2:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Luc Van
Defendant:
S. Suprovici, Stephen Atkins and J. Arandia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Christopher Nguyen v. District Attorney Berks County, et al
as 24-1582
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NGUYEN
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BERKS COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI
Nguyen v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
Anh Vu Nguyen
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders #146274 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin Sanders
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Ryan Thornell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Guevara v. Margoles et al
as 0:2024cv01482
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Guevara
Defendant:
Michelle Margoles, Laura Provinzino, Paul Schnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lentz v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10198
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
MDOC, Heidi Washington, Aleksandra Wilanowski and others
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martell v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Leandre Martell
Defendant:
Well Path LLC, Kyle F Martineau, Ralph Aquino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
