Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Brown v. United States of America, The et al
as 1:2021cv01688
Defendant:
M. Potts and United States of America, The
Plaintiff:
William Otis James Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macklin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00379
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Quintana, Lieutenant Barker and others
Petitioner:
Otis James Macklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maklin v. Greenville County Sheriff's Department
as 6:2020cv02967
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Otis James Maklin and Otis James Macklin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. United States of America, The
as 2:2019cv08034
Petitioner:
William Otis James Brown
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Macklin v. USA
as 6:2019cv01113
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Otis James Macklin, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BROWN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OTIS JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OTIS JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Samaniego et al
as 2:2017cv00965
Plaintiff:
William Otis James Brown
Defendant:
John Samaniego, Jay Fondran, Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. Speed et al
as 2:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM OTIS JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
Billy Carlton Speed, Elizabeth Bigham, Sam Skelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis James Compton v. Warden Leroy Cartledge
as 16-7420
Petitioner - Appellant:
OTIS JAMES COMPTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
