Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Pullen v. Bruce
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendel Pullen
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2023cv06998
Plaintiff:
Adam E. Murphy
Defendant:
ERT Medical Officer K. Rodriguez, ERT Officer Pullen, ERT Officer Prelvukaj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Steiner v. Brent Kempster, et al
as 23-35445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD J. STEINER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENT KEMPSTER, Officer, La Push Police Department, NICOLE WHEELER, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort and APRIL BLAIR-PULLEN, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort
Appellee:
QUILEUTE TRIBE
Bronfman v. Pullen et al
as 3:2023cv00619
Petitioner:
Clare Bronfman
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Bryan Antonelli and others
Defendant:
Richard Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Newland v. Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Newland, Jr
Defendant:
Staff, GTL Staff, Warr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Self v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Darrell Self
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Saleem v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Muhammad Saleem
Respondent:
T. Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alkafi v. Pullen
as 3:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Kasan Alkafi
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Giovinco v. Pullen
as 23-251
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles Anthony Giovinco
Respondent / Appellee:
Timethea Pullen, Warden
PULLEN v. GUILFORD COUNTY
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
CHARLES ANTHONY PULLEN
Respondent:
GUILFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
