Cases 1 - 10 of 100
(PC)Johnson v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2026cv07470
Plaintiff:
Carddarius J. Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, North Kern State Prison, A. Cuchilla Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena-Ramos v. Warden, FCI Thomson et al
as 3:2026cv50395
Plaintiff:
Orbin Joel Pena-Ramos
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Thomson, Captain Zoboda, Captain Rios and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. White et al
as 2:2026cv00183
Plaintiff:
Joseph Angel Martinez
Defendant:
Matthias White and David Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Bossidy
as 3:2026cv01444
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ramos
Defendant:
Bossidy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. United States of America
as 26-2460
Petitioner:
GREGORY RAMOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodolfo Ortiz v. Alba, et al
as 26-13109
Plaintiff:
RODOLFO ORTIZ
Defendant:
ALBA, OZOKPOR, REINS and others
Ramos-Candelaria v. US
as 26-2001
Petitioner:
WILBERTO RAMOS-CANDELARIA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
NAFG, MCRO, ZAG and others
Barahona-Ramos v. Guerrero
as 26-20487
Petitioner:
Rene Barahona-Ramos
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
ANTONUCCIO v. NORTHAMPTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2026cv06445
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY JAIL, DEANN LAWRENCE, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI MITCHELL ANTONUCCIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Marwill et al
as 2:2026cv05882
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramos San Miguel Hernandez, III
Defendant:
Suzanne Scheiner Marwill, Victoria Wisthoff, Warren J Granville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
