Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
IN RE: REGINALD JOHNSON
as 2:2023cv03966
Petitioner: REGINALD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Collins
as 1:2023cv00195
Petitioner: Reginald Johnson
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID and Bryan Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blount v. Dunn et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00039
Plaintiff: Marquis Keonta Blount
Defendant: Jefferson Dunn, Dennis Stamper, Matthew Brand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff: Reginald Johnson
Defendant: The State of Texas, Taylor County, Texas, Lee Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00457
Defendant: Reginald Johnson and Lewis Babcock
Plaintiff: Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson
as 1:2020cv03200
Defendant: Reginald Johnson
Plaintiff: Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 1:2019cv04095
Petitioner: Reginald Johnson
Respondent: Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pharu El v. State of Nebraska et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv00371
Defendant: Reginald Johnson, State of Nebraska, Christopher J. Melton and others
Plaintiff: Mi'Te Pharu El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Johnson v. Sherman, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00984
Defendant: J. Collins, Stuart Sherman and Richard Milan
Plaintiff: Reginald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sloan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv01846
Petitioner: Reginald Johnson
Respondent: Warden Brigham Sloan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?