Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Brooks v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
Solomon Brooks and King Solomon Sekhemre El Neter
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Kevin McMahill, Andrea Kever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Spates v. Charles Reese, et al
as 23-3154
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Christopher K. Spates
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi, MO DOC Director, John Doe 1, CO I, John Doe 2, Housing Unit 2 Sergeant and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Charles Reese, Robert Turner and John Machino
TURNER v. AYISI et al
as 1:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
M. AYISI, DR. HAWK, OFFICER HARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. AYISI et al
as 1:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
M. AYISI and CAPTAIN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00898
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHNSON, OFFICER WILLIAMS, OFFICER J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00889
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHNSON, OFFICER J. SMITH, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv00824
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
CAPTAIN JOHNSON, OFFICER SOUTHERN, OFFICER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. HIGH POINT POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2021cv00591
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Defendant:
HIGH POINT POLICE DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. FORTIN et al
as 1:2021cv00517
Defendant:
WELLPATH LLC, MARSHA KERR, ELIZABETH FORTIN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Tanner et al
as 2:2021cv00421
Defendant:
Sgt King, John Craina, Department of Public Safety & Corrections State of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
