Cases 1 - 10 of 930
Pettis v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coates v. Lt. Keistler et al
as 1:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Alkein Coates
Defendant:
Lt. Keistler, Tyler, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carpenter v. Stearns
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lee Carpenter, III
Defendant:
Warden Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Parker v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sammie H Parker
Defendant:
James Gibson, Anthony Jackson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Stewart et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Le Tresia Stewart and Robert P. Myers, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordell v. Maverick County Jail
as 6:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Sammy Alvin Cordell
Defendant:
Maverick County Jail, FNU Chavez, FNU Aguilar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettis v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 5:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Sammie Henry Pettis
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELLE v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
SAMMY D. BELLE
Respondent:
KEVIN RANSOM, LARRY KRASHNER and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Nichols v. Andes
as 2:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
Sammie Lee Nichols
Respondent:
Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
