Cases 1 - 10 of 596
Walker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Derrick S. Walker
Defendant:
D. Hudson, (fnu) Walker, (fnu) Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Cain and Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sargent Noah Page, Jailer Ken Claud, Thomas Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Destined George v. Neeley
as 24-6524
Plaintiff:
DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE
Defendant:
SARGENT NEELEY, LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT FLEMING and others
Smith v. J. Frago et al
as 4:2024cv01840
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
J. Frago, Officer Harrington and Sargent C. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Desouze v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Captain Williams, Sargent Dixon, Pearl Legendre Taplin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. LOVERA et al
as 5:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
JOVAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
JERAMY LOVERA, OFFICER BEST, SARGENT NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iacono v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Aca Daniel Iacono
Defendant:
Captain Danny Woods and Sargent Jenifer Kost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Escobedo et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Escobedo and Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Nicholl-Embree v. James George, et al
as 24-1743
Plaintiff:
Stephen Robert Nicholl-Embree, also known as Stephen Robert Stark
Defendant:
James George, Sargent, Beth Skinner, Director, Stephen Weis, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
