Cases 1 - 10 of 24,336
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piper v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Robert James Piper
Respondent:
Warden Scott Ceresini, The State of Delaware and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Perez-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Daontae T. Scott
Defendant:
E. Perez-Lugo, Christina Crews, R. Bassa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Householder v. Jordan et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Matthew Householder
Defendant:
Scott Jordan, Cookie Crews and Sgt. Jimo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buth v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Van Buth
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Lumpkin
as 24-20215
Petitioner:
Scott Edward Palmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
SCOTT v. WEEKS
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM SCOTT
Defendant:
NOLAN WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Cupp
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Wynston Scott
Defendant:
A Cupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
