Cases 1 - 10 of 1,299
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalls v. USA
as 1:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
William Isaac Smalls
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
State of Indiana, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPENCER-HILL et al v. ACJF et al
as 1:2024cv05515
Plaintiff:
JASON T. SPENCER-HILL, ATEBA MAME HASSAN, NOBLE EL and others
Defendant:
ACJF, ACPS, DAVID KELSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Smalls et al
as 6:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
Officer FNU Smalls and OIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
GARNET SMALL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SMALLS v. North Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
THERRAN RASHEED SMALLS
Defendant:
North Charleston Police Department, Officer Adams, Officer Jellico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elwood Small v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 24-1592
Plaintiff:
ELWOOD SMALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
