Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Johnson v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cruze
as 4:2022cv00310
Petitioner:
Jess Tyler Johnson
Respondent:
Brian Cruze
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stapp v. Elizabethton Police Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. STAPP and Timothy D Stapp
Defendant:
ELIZABETHTON POLICE DEPT., Carter County Sheriff's Office, E.P.D. SGT. CURTIS L. BULLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Nacogdoches County, Texas et al
as 9:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Demetri Sims
Defendant:
Nacogdoches County, Texas, Unidentified Officer, Deputy Tyler Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pearson
as 1:2021cv01938
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Defendant:
Doup Pearson and Doug Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLATER v. THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 7:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CHANCE SLATER
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, Sgt TYLER JOHNSON, Deputy GROOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455
Johnson v. Bruns et al
as 4:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Defendant:
David Bruns, Margaret Johnson, Missouri State Public Defender System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455
Moore v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Todd Wiemer, Linn County Correctional Center and Tyler Johnson
Plaintiff:
Paris D Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
