Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anderson v. Hillton et al
as 2:2023cv02043
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Anderson
Defendant:
Lisa Hillton, Mrs. Candice Whisman, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaundelle Dial v. Von Blanckensee, et al
as 22-16053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAUNDELLE DIAL
Defendant / Appellee:
VON B. BLANCKENSEE, Complex USP Warden at FCC USP Tucson, JACKSON, Unknown; Administrative Remedy Coordinator, Executive Assistant, FCC, USP Tucson, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Associate Warden, Programs and others
Hill v. Lyn et al
as 5:2020ct03177
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Tamara S. Lyn, M.D. Carvajal and Unknown Case Manager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. Glass et al
as 4:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
Antwuan Allen
Defendant:
Dale Glass, Jeffrey Carson, Irene Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
von der Heide v. Tripp
as 5:2016ct03025
Plaintiff:
Klaus von der Heide
Defendant:
Brick Tripp, Unknown Doctors, Unknown Nurses and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 11-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMERAWOMAN FOR RESPONSE TEAM, H Moffatt Officer at USP Lewisburg, UNKNOWN ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, et al at USP Lewisburg, 1 ONE UNKNOWN CASE MANAGER, at USP Lewisburg Mr Giordani and others
Brown v. Hepner et al
as 3:2010cv01785
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
J. Hepner, M Edinger, Ivan Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franco v. Unknown Case Managers
as 1:2010cv00320
Petitioner:
Martin Tarin Franco
Respondent:
Unknown Case Managers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GROSS v. VEACH et al
as 2:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELMER GROSS, SR.
Defendant:
R.V. VEACH, MARK A. BEZY, DAVE EBBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
