Cases 1 - 10 of 20
White #285964 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of State Police, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Pittman et al
as 1:2016cv00263
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson
Defendant:
William Pittman, Eric Briscoe, Richard Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Walton v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-1677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BERNARD WALTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL HEYNS, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, ANTHONY STEWART, Deputy Warden, WILLIAM PITTMAN, Assistant ARUS and others
Walton #360677 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00336
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Walton #360677
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, Anthony Stewart, William Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv01568
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, EVELYN CRUZ CAROFILIS, KATHIE DEFURIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovell v. Pittman
as 4:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Lovell
Defendant:
William Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2012cv03297
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2011cv06604
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 10-4246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, VINCENT RUSSO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
