Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vine, Christopher v. Dotson, Michael et al
as 3:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blair Vine
Defendant:
Michael Dotson, CO Morales, Lt. Nash and others
Not Yet Classified:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vines v. Calhoun County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
George Taylor Carl Vines
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff Department and Steven Hinkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell Larson v. Buchanan County Jail, et al
as 24-1485
Plaintiff:
Russell A. Larson
Defendant:
Buchanan County Jail, Scott Buzynski, Mike Rothford and others
Vine, Christopher v. Johnson, Zayne et al
as 3:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Christopher Blair Vine
Defendant:
Zayne Johnson, Jared Johnson, Jesse Koltis and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vines v. Hixon et al
as 5:2023cv05765
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Vines
Respondent:
Acting Warden Kevin Hixon and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Ronald Vines
as 23-2843
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD DEWITT VINES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Davidson Co. Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Norman
Defendant:
Davidson Co. Sheriff's Office, Pat l/n/u, Trinity Food Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
