Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Coleman v. Bowker et al
as 0:2023cv01849
Plaintiff:
Mr. William Coleman, Mr. William Theoplas Coleman, Mr. William T. Coleman and others
Defendant:
Officer Bowker, Officer Maldanado and Rock Hill Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
SCOTT v. BUFFALOE et al
as 1:2022cv00802
Petitioner:
WILLIAM COLEMAN SCOTT
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
OConnor v. Norman et al
as 3:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Casey OConnor, James Casey O, OConnor and others
Defendant:
Brad Norman, Charles Edge and William Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OConnor v. Helder et al
as 5:2021cv05083
Plaintiff:
Casey OConnor, Casey O, OConnor and others
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Charles Edge, Jail Administrator Kelly Cantrel, Sheriff Brad Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OConnor v. Norman et al
as 5:2021cv05084
Plaintiff:
Casey OConnor, Casey O, OConnor and others
Defendant:
Former Sheriff Charles Edge, Sheriff Brad Norman and Lieutenant William Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felts v. King
as 1:2019cv24978
Plaintiff:
William Coleman Felts
Defendant:
W. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camp v. Doe et al
as 4:2019cv01884
Defendant:
John "Rogers" Doe, John "Miller" Doe, Jane "Brown" Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William Coleman Camp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Felts v. Officer R Jones
as 1:2019cv20901
Plaintiff:
William Coleman Felts
Defendant:
Officer R Jones and Officer Roger Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. GEO et al
as 2:2017cv01595
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Moses
Defendant:
GEO, Allen Correctional Center, David J Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Agnew et al
as 2:2017cv01430
Petitioner:
Anthony William Coleman
Respondent:
Carla Hacker Agnew and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
