Cases 1 - 10 of 101
FAIR v. USA
as 1:2023cv00972
Petitioner:
RONNIE WILTON FAIR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ZACK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andersen v. Wilton
as 0:2023cv02549
Plaintiff:
Travis Clay Andersen
Defendant:
Christian S. Wilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilton v. Haynes et al
as 3:2023cv05721
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wayne Wilton
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, Sara Kariko, Scott Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARWICK v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
DARRYL BRYAN BARWICK
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reginald Wilton v. Tomas Fithian, et al
as 23-35012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINALD WAYNE WILTON
Defendant / Appellee:
TOMAS FITHIAN, RONALD HAYNES, DENISE BREWER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01411
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Helder et al
as 5:2022cv05136
Plaintiff:
David Wilton Ford
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Helder, Deputy Bilbrey, Deputy Vanderback and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FRANCIS
Defendant:
MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, OFFICER J KING, SGT E WILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Rose, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 22-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, HILL-FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
