Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingo v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail
as 2:2023cv02646
Plaintiff:
Sarah Denise Wingo
Defendant:
Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingo v. Maddox
as 1:2022cv04686
Petitioner:
Rasheed Wingo
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingo v. Heading et al
as 3:2022cv02351
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wingo
Defendant:
Sheilia Heading, Cody Cross, C/O Havery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingo v. Maddox et al
as 1:2022cv04411
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Wingo
Defendant:
Melody M. Maddox and Randy Akies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Wingo v. USA
as 4:2022cv00726
Petitioner:
Edward Wingo, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Latham v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latham
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Connie Gipson, Raymond Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pickett v. Barnett et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Defendant:
Ronnie Barnett, Bo, Tammie McCalpin and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrant v. Cortes et al
as 3:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Arrant
Defendant:
V. Cortes, P. Wingo, Aukerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
