Cases 41 - 50 of 85
United States of America v. 1961 labeled cases, more or less, each case containing 36/12 packets of an article of drug in individual cartons: et al
as 1:2014cv00399
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1961 labeled cases, more or less, each case containing 36/12 packets of an article of drug in individual cartons, 124 labeled cases, more or less, each case containing 144/10 mL bottles of an article of drug labeled in part:, 96 labeled cases, more or less, each case containing 12/8 ounce bottles of an article of drug in individual cartons labeled in part and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Mendoza-Cruz' Personal Property et al
as 5:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mendoza-Cruz' Personal Property, A Hi Point Model 995 Rifle, Twelve (12) Rounds 9MM Ammunition and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
United States of America v. An Aggregated total of $323,104.00, more or less, in United States Currency et al
as 1:2013cv01063
Respondent:
2004 BMW M3S, Convertible, VIN: WBSBR93454PK07328, 2005 BMW M3S CP, VIN: WBSBL93455PN63569, 2011 Dodge Ram Truck, VIN: ID7RVICT5BS651318 and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Cases, 547 et al
as 2:2013cv01246
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cases, 547, Cases, 2,348 and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. 512 CASES, MORE OR LESS, OF ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART et al
as 2:2013cv00843
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
512 CASES, MORE OR LESS, OF ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART, 1030 CASES, MORE OR LESS, OF AN ARTICLE OF FOOD, LABELED IN PART and ALL OTHER ARTICLES OF FOOD LABELED AS CONTAINED 1,3 DIMETHYLAMYLAMINE HCI (DMAA) OR ITS CHEMICAL EQUIVALENT IN VARIOUS FLAVORS, SIZES, AND FORMS AND VARIOUS SIZED CONTAINERS
United States of America v. 860 cases more or less of an article of food et al
as 8:2013cv01675
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
860 cases more or less of an article of food, 848 cases more or less of an article of food and 1,3-Dimethylamylamine HCl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. The sum of approximately $554,058.15 seized from Cummunity Bank NA, Acct. NO. 630022416 in the name of: Seneca-Cayuga of Oklahoma Skydancer Convenience Store et al
as 6:2013cv06313
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The sum of approximately $554,058.15 seized from Cummunity Bank NA, Acct. NO. 630022416 in the name of: Seneca-Cayuga of Oklahoma Skydancer Convenience Store, $4,928.38 in United States Currency, Eighteen (18) Master Cases of Cigarettes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $6,400.00 in US Currency et al
as 5:2013cv00589
Defendant:
$6,400.00 in US Currency , Coins, Four Hundred Thirteen Silver, Eighteen 1 oz Silver Bars, and Eight 10 oz Silver Bars, $19,600.00 in US Currency and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Todd William Hoss , Bruce Landen Middlebrook , Melissa Middlebrook and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
United States of America v. $77,000.00 More or Less in United States Currency; Real Property Situated at 405 Browns Creek Road, Saint Albans, Kanawha County, West Virginia et al
as 2:2013cv02095
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
77,000.00 More or Less in United States Currency, Real Property Situated at 405 Browns Creek Road, Saint Albans, Kanawha County, West Virginia, One 1966 Chevrolet El Camino and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Williams Personal Property, et al
as 4:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Williams Personal Property Specifically, Nineteen (19) Rounds of .40 Caliber Ammunition, Five (5) Rounds of .357 Caliber Ammunition and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924 Forfeiture Property - Firearm
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
