Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Black et al v. Goldman et al
as 1:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Siva D. Black, Santo Daime Vine Cult and Federation Santo Daime
Defendant:
Jonathan Goldman, Church of the Holy Light of the Queen and Essential Light Institute
Blankson v. ACMH Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04114
Plaintiff:
Kobe Adjei Blankson
Defendant:
ACMH Inc., Well Life Network, Human Resource Administration Public Assistance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
United States of America v. Approximately Sixty-One Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($61,485.00) in United States Currency, seized on or about September 7, 2019 in Queens, New York
as 2:2020cv06358
Defendant:
Approximately Sixty-One Thousand Four Hundred Eighty-Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($61,485.00) in United States Currency, seized on or about September 7, 2019 in Queens, New York
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 460 E. Pershing Avenue, York, Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Real Property Located at E. Princess Street, York, Pennsylvania, Real Property Located at 1142 E. Poplar Street, York, Pennsylvania, Real Property Located at 460 E. Pershing Avenue, York, Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. The Royal Seal of Queen Munjeong et al
as 2:2016cv07036
Defendant:
The Royal Seal of King Hyeonjong and The Royal Seal of Queen Munjeong
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Real Property and Premises Located at 211-11 45th Road, Queens, New York 11361 and All Proceeds Traceable Thereto et al
as 1:2016cv04914
Defendant:
Fifteen Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty-One and No Cents ($15,761.00) More or Less In United States Currency Seized on or About April 4, 2016 From a 2003 Lexus Automobile New York License Plate Numb, Five Hundred Fifty-Four Dollars and No Cents ($554.00), More or Less in United States Currency Seized on or about April 4, 2016, Forty Five Gold Coins and Twenty One Silver Coins More or Less Seized on or about April 5, 2016 From Safe Deposit Box Number 764 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Approximately $91,246.57 from New Millenium Medical Imaging P.C., Investors Bank Acct. #...8926 et al
as 4:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $91,246.57 from New Millenium Medical Imaging P.C., Investors Bank Acct. #...8926, Approximately $4,098.60 from Best Quality X-Ray Inc., Investors Bank Acct. #...0289, Approximately $56,278.90 from SR Wellnes PT P.C., Northfield Bank Acct. #...0262 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 3300 Queen City Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina
as 3:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 3300 Queen City Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina
Claimant:
Shreeji Hospitality Queen City, LLC
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. RP 2230 Park Avenue Cincinnati Ohio, Real Property Located at et al
as 1:2013cv00535
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
RP 2230 Park Avenue Cincinnati Ohio, Real Property Located at, Contents of US Bank xx5618 in the name of Queen City Investment Fund II, Contents of US Bank x8448 in the name of Queen City Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. 87-37 Justice Avenue, Elmhurst, Queens County, New York
as 1:2012cv03229
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
87-37 Justice Avenue, Elmhurst, Queens County, New York, $666,655.46 in Funds seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account x8965, One 2012 Mercedes Benz E350WR and others
Claimant:
Jan Ying Chan , Kaung H. Chan , ChenHsin Chan and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
