Cases 1 - 10 of 154
CHANDLER v. QUICKCHEK CORPORATION
as 3:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHANDLER
Defendant:
QUICKCHEK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
CHANDLER v. RED DOOR FOODS LLC
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE CHANDLER
Defendant:
RED DOOR FOODS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Usera v. Beal et al
as 2:2023cv13136
Plaintiff:
Christian N Usera and Chandler Kennedy
Defendant:
Stewart Beal, Beal Properties LLC, Ciara Brannon and others
Chandler v. Long Falls Paperboard, LLC
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Lone Falls Paperboard, LLC and Long Falls Paperboard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Chandler v. Prudential Life Insurance Company of America
as 2:2023cv02902
Plaintiff:
David Chandler
Defendant:
Prudential Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mark Darren Walker v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Walker
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Lt. Joseph Hernandez, Capt. Orlando Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Medical Malpractice
Crabtree v. USAble Life
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Chandler R Crabtree
Defendant:
USAble Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Lamb et al v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Lamb, Matthew C Lay, Eric D Acosta and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, George Theron Bynum and Jack Blair
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chandler v D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Timothy Arthur Chandler, III
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
