Cases 91 - 100 of 336
ADT LLC et al v. Safe Home Security, Inc.
as 1:2020cv23918
Defendant:
Safe Home Security and Safe Home Security, Inc.
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC and The ADT Security Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
The Door Church of McAllen, Inc. v. ADT LLC, d/b/a Protection One
as 7:2020cv00286
Defendant:
ADT LLC, d/b/a Protection One
Plaintiff:
The Door Church of McAllen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Naiman v. ADT LLC
as 2:2020at00887
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Plaintiff:
Sidney Naiman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Naiman v. ADT LLC
as 2:2020cv01821
Defendant:
ADT LLC and Native Media LLC
Plaintiff:
Sidney Naiman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Madison et al v. Aviles et al
as 3:2020cv02516
Intervenor Defendant:
ADT LLC
Plaintiff:
Taylor Madison and Angie Dickson
Defendant:
Telesforo Aviles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingram v. ADT LLC (PLR2)
as 3:2020cv00376
Plaintiff:
Armenia Ingram
Defendant:
ADT, LLC and ADT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richman Technology Corporation v. ADT LLC
as 1:2020cv00979
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Plaintiff:
Richman Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ADT LLC, et al. v. Vivint Smart Home, Inc., et al
as 1:2020cv23391
Defendant:
Legacy Vivant Smart Home, Inc., Vivant Smart Home, Inc., The ADT Security Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
ADT LLC
Counter Claimant:
Legacy Vivint Smart Home, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Shim et al v. ADT LLC et al
as 4:2020cv01009
Defendant:
ADT LLC doing business as ADT Security Services, Timothy Brantley, Dylan Bickings and others
Plaintiff:
Jong Hee Shim doing business as Shim's Diamond Company and Jung Shim doing business as Shim's Diamond Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
