Cases 91 - 100 of 100
David Meyers v. Mr. Mullens
as 26-6231
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
INTEL OFFICER LIEUTENANT MR. MULLENS, Red Onion State Prison, ROSP MAIL STAFF, SERGEANT T. DEEL, ROSP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clements v. Skinner et al
as 4:2026cv00062
Plaintiff:
Keaton Lee Clements
Defendant:
Beth Skinner and Iowa Medical Classification Center
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Peterzalek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. T. Meyer
as 26-6195
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
T. MEYER, VADOC Western Regional Administrator, MS. MISTY COUNTS, VADOC Western Regional PREA Analyst, VADOC CENTRAL CLASSIFICATIONS MANAGER and others
Lynch v. John/Jane Doe Warden et al
as 1:2026cv00625
Plaintiff:
James Lynch
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Warden, John/Jane Doe Assistant Warden, John/Jane Doe Transportation/Intake Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. J. Artrip
as 26-6174
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN J. ARTRIP, S. CAUGHRON, WRSP Operations Manager, TINA TOWNSEND, WRSP Health Services Administrator and others
Robert Chambers v. Antonio Johnson, Jr., et al
as 26-1196
Plaintiff:
Robert Chambers
Defendant:
Antonio D. Johnson, Jr., Major/Chief Security Officer, Tucker Unit, Todd Ball, Warden, Tucker Unit, Perry, Sergeant, Tucker Unit and others
David Meyers v. T. Hall
as 26-6175
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MAJOR T. HALL, Wallens Ridge State Prison, M. POZEG, LT. MR. PAULEY and others
Tolbert v. Holland, et al.
as 26-637
Plaintiff:
JOEL TOLBERT, III
Defendant:
B. HOLLAND, Sergeant, A. ROSSI, Sergeant, GAMBA, Deputy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
