Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 103
v. The Sater Design Collection, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv03121
Defendant: The Sater Design Collection, Inc., H&F Homebuilders, Inc. and Greg Huckabay
Plaintiff: The Sater Design Collection, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Pickard v. H. F. Martek Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv14295
Plaintiff: Kristine Pickard
Defendant: H. F. Martek Company, Inc. and Harold F. Martek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Goldfield Plantation et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2009cv00087
Plaintiff: Goldfield Plantation, Goldfield Plantation, Goldfield Plantation and others
Defendant: Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience AG, Bayer Cropscience GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Julian Rochester v. H. Herlong
as 09-7522
Plaintiff - Appellant: JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee: H. M. HERLONG, R. S. CARR, H. F. FLOYD and others
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. H. F. Huster Company, Inc.
as 1:2009cv02787
Plaintiff: Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund and Chicago and Northeast Illinois Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice and Trainee Program Fund
Defendant: H. F. Huster Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Scuba v. Inderlied et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00483
Plaintiff: Robert S. Scuba
Defendant: H. F Inderlied, Robert Humholtz and Geauga County, Ohio
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rochester v. Herlong et al
as 2:2008cv01395
Plaintiff: Julian E. Rochester
Defendant: H. M. Herlong, R. S. Carr, H. F. Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
F H F L L C v. Chesapeake Louisiana L P
as 5:2008cv01727
Plaintiff: F H F L L C
Defendant: Chesapeake Louisiana L P
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Jimenez et al v. H&F II, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02651
Plaintiff: Yvette Jimenez and Claribel Garcia
Defendant: H&F II, Inc., Henry Arango and Frances Arango
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Both
H F BRADBERRY v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2007cv70832
Plaintiff: H F BRADBERRY
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?