Cases 91 - 100 of 101
Bonano v. Alonso et al
as 1:2012cv03646
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Defendant:
Daniel Alonso, Mark Dwyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Rock et al
as 9:2012cv00447
Plaintiff:
Eugene C. Jones
Defendant:
Rock, J. Marienelli, T. Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENNELL v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON, et al
as 3:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HALE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CASHOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Makdessi v. Fields et al
as 7:2011cv00262
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Jane Doe, Sgt. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Hazzard et al
as 2:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks
Defendant:
Jeffrey Norman Hazzard, Ms. Wessell, LT. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan Mendez v. Ms. Johnson, et al
as 11-1363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant:
C/O JOHN DOE, I, C/O JOHN DOE, II, INMATES and others
SLIFKIN et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv04351
Plaintiff:
ANN SLIFKIN and LOUIS SLIFKIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , VINCE GOODCHILD , POLICE OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE #'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roddy Horsley v. Washington State, et al
as 10-35570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODDY HORSLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STAFFORD CREEK CORRECTION CENTER and others
Stephen et al v. Hanley et al
as 1:2003cv06226
Defendant:
Edgar Bourdon, Brill, City Of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Stephen and Sean Stephen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony L. Cooper v. Sgt. Kennington et al.
as 3:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cooper
Defendant:
Sgt. Kennington, Sgt. Gambriel, J. Dover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
