Cases 91 - 100 of 140
Boyd v. Pollard
as 2:2012cv00388
Petitioner:
Demetrius M Boyd
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Demers et al
as 1:2012cv00092
Defendant:
Barrington, NH, Town of, Candace M. Boyd, Daniel J. Demers and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Boyd et al
as 2:2012cv00418
Defendant:
Steven M. Boyd and Jennifer Boyd
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anthony Hall v. Mr. Hopkin
as 12-6204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT COX
Defendant:
KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEALTH SERVICES PROVIDER'S KEEN MOUNTAIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
BOYD V. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv59271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. BOYD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Anthony M. Boyd v. Christoph Boatwright et al
as 4:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Boyd
Defendant:
Christoph Boatwright, Tammy Stokes, Kevin Street and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Boatright et al
as 4:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Boyd
Defendant:
Christoph Boatright, C. Boatright and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64966
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M BOYD, JR and MILDRED L BOYD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv01527
Plaintiff:
Ola M Boyd , George W Boyd , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. TCR Enterprises
as 4:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Boyd
Defendant:
TCR Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
