Cases 91 - 100 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Philip M. Ross v. Randal C. Gray
as 5:2017cv00883
Defendant:
Honorable Randal C. Gray
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FILING ERROR
as 1:2017cv00882
Defendant:
Honorable Randal C. Gray
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Guzman v. Munduta Auto Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04685
Plaintiff:
Luis R Guzman
Defendant:
Munduta Auto Transport, Inc. and Jorge M Ross-Morrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00445
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kearney v. NYS DOCCS
as 17-218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Kearney
Defendant - Appellee:
D. Gebo, Correctional Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility, M. Ross, Correction Officer; Great Meadow Correctional Facility and Rae, Sgt.; Coxsackie Correctional Facility, FKA Roe
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Jon Miller, M.D.; Coxsackie Correctional Facility and Jane Doe, Nurse; Coxsackie Correctional Facility
ROSS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07928
Plaintiff:
KEITH M. ROSS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans Law Corporation, APLC et al v. Burgos et al
as 2:2016cv13550
Plaintiff:
Evans Law Corporation, APLC and Robert B. Evans, III
Defendant:
Cesar R. Burgos , Burgos Law Corporation, APLC , George McGregor and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Matthew Verdiglione v. Thomas Ira Ross et al
as 8:2016cv00921
Defendant:
Dance Academy Fitness, Does, Sima M. Ross and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Verdiglione
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
