Cases 91 - 100 of 141
McFadden v. City of Sandusky et al
as 3:2014cv01753
Plaintiff:
James M McFadden
Defendant:
City of Sandusky , Michael Campbell and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guzman v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv04800
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Guzman
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Sean Campbell, Emily Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Quiroz v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv04375
Plaintiff:
Bruno Quiroz, a minor, by and through his father, Alberto Cortez
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Michael Campbell and James Foley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Campbell v. Lee County, Florida Board of County Commissioners
as 2:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michael Campbell
Defendant:
Lee County, Florida Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Raub v. Michael Campbell
as 14-1277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON RAUB
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CAMPBELL and JOHN DOES 1-10
Defendant:
DANIEL LEE BOWEN, RUSSELL MORGAN GRANDERSON, LLOYD C. CHASER and others
United States of America v. Morris (Frazer)
as 14-702
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Patrick Lewis, AKA P-Money, Darren Morris, AKA Funny, Alphonso Campbell and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jamal Frazer
Monica H. Dible v. Department of Fair Housing et al
as 2:2013cv09364
Defendant:
Linda Campbell, Michael Campbell, Department of Fair Housing and others
Plaintiff:
Monica H. Dible
Baams v. Coakley et al
as 1:2013cv13115
Plaintiff:
Ronny Baams, Jr.
Defendant:
Martha Coakley, Peter A. Pepe, Bruce Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
