Cases 91 - 100 of 554
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Michael Benson v. High Road Operating, LLC
as 22-1756
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BENSON, KRISTEN BENSON, SCOTT BLASS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
HIGH ROAD OPERATING, LLC
Geolink Limited v. Mahmood
as 22-20354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Geolink Limited (U.K.)
Defendant / Appellee:
Mazhar Mahmood, Prime Downhole Holdings, L.L.C., Prime Downhole Manufacturing, L.L.C. and others
UL-HASSAN v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00257
Petitioner:
MAHMOOD UL-HASSAN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Karmagreen, LLC v. Elnaham et al
as 1:2022cv02581
Plaintiff:
Karmagreen, LLC
Defendant:
Mahmood Elnaham and Ismail Elnaham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
MAHMOOD v. GLOBAL KICKS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
JUNAID MAHMOOD
Defendant:
GLOBAL KICKS, LLC doing business as ESTEEM DC, NICHOLAS VISELLI and KEVIN NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parveen et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2022cv03213
Plaintiff:
Zakia Parveen and Mahmood Shahid
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates, P.C. and Suresh Budhoo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dawood v. Siki Eagle Sarl
as 2:2022at00524
Plaintiff:
Mahmood Dawood
Defendant:
Siki Eagle Sarl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dawood v. Siki Eagle Sarl
as 2:2022cv00896
Plaintiff:
Mahmood Dawood
Defendant:
Siki Eagle Sarl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
