Cases 91 - 100 of 2,835
DYKES v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
MISTY DYKES
Defendant:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Potts et al v. West Virginia University Board of Governors et al
as 2:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Misty D. Potts and Jerome Potts
Defendant:
West Virginia University Board of Governors, Dustin Spencer, DO and Dustin Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
MCNEILL v. MCCLAIN et al.
as 2:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
MISTY R. MCNEILL
Defendant:
JOSEPH D. MCCLAIN and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Scarborough v. Forrest County Courts
as 2:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Misty Scarborough
Defendant:
Forrest County Courts
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fair v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Misty Fair
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Misty M. Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Womochil v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03737
Plaintiff:
Misty Womochil
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sullivan v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Charles Sullivan
Defendant:
Wellpath, Tereasa White, Sasha Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
