Cases 91 - 100 of 100
1st Source Bank v. Neto et al
as 3:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Defendant:
Joaquim Salles Leite Neto and Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Heggemeier v. Caldwell County, Texas, et al
as 15-50485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD R. HEGGEMEIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CALDWELL COUNTY TEXAS, CALDWELL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, ALFRED MUNOZ, Individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner and others
Horton et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv20662
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Horton, Kimberly Horton, David Bear McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
US v. Neto
as 15-1133
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE NETO
Interested Party:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.
David Neto v. Takata Corporation et al
as FLS/1:14-cv-24446
Plaintiff:
David Neto
Defendant:
Takata Corporation , TK Holdings, Inc. and HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
David Neto v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv24446
Plaintiff:
David Neto , David W. Ellis, Sr. , Howard G. Frey and others
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as SC/2:14-cv-04433
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Horton , David Bear McLaughlin , Mary Christine Rapoza and others
Defendant:
Takata Corporation , TK Holdings, Inc. , HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Horton et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv04433
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Horton, David Bear McLaughlin, Mary Christine Rapoza and others
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, Highland Industries Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
