Cases 91 - 100 of 103
Ickom v. Scott County, MS et al
as 3:2010cv00568
Plaintiff:
William Ickom
Defendant:
Scott County, MS, William S. Richardson, Jim Kellogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52518
Plaintiff:
HAYMON S. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RICHARDSON v. RICCI et al
as 2:2010cv04954
Petitioner:
JOHN S. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
MICHELLE RICCI and PAULA T. DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DORN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv04281
Plaintiff:
TYREL S. DORN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA, 12TH DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72353
Plaintiff:
HAYMON S. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Owners Insurance Company v. Kinard et al
as 2:2010cv01681
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Larry E Kinard, Summerville, Town of, Hoa Van Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Leonard v. City of Columbus, Georgia et al
as 4:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charlie Leonard
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Georgia, Columbus Consolidated Government, Columbus Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2008cv00445
Plaintiff:
Jackie S Richardson and Jackie S Richardson
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Richardson et al v. Erwin et al
as 3:2007cv02117
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H Richardson and Jennie S Richardson
Defendant:
James E Erwin and Mike Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myles v. Barnett et al
as 3:2007cv00529
Plaintiff:
John Roland Myles, Jr.
Defendant:
Ross R. Barnett, Jr. and Samac S. Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
