Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Shanklin v. Shaker Heights City School District et al.
as 1:2026cv01096
Plaintiff:
Stacey Shanklin
Defendant:
Shaker Heights City School District, City of Shaker Heights, Shaker Heights Public Library Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cypress v. Andrews et al
as 1:2026cv02676
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renia Cypress
Defendant:
Judge Mirna G. Andrews, Judge Beryl Anderson, Debra DeBerry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkerson v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv03227
Plaintiff:
Stacey Danielle Wilkerson
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Clervrain v. Griffin, et al
as 26-1534
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, ASHLY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE, FRIDELYNE MAISONEUVE and others
Defendant:
ANTWAUN GRIFFIN, ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN, DIEDRA HENRY-SPIRES and others
Sanger et al v. Kureha Energy Solutions, LLC
as 4:2026cv03601
Plaintiff:
Stacey Sanger, Anthony Luchi and Jessie Boss
Defendant:
Kureha Energy Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Orellana v. Bexar County et al
as 5:2026cv02946
Plaintiff:
Isaac Orellana
Defendant:
Bexar County, Stacey Orellana, Laurel Ridge Treatment Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacey Walters v. Clorox Co.
as 26-1560
Plaintiff:
STACEY WALTERS
Defendant:
CLOROX CO., d/b/a Fresh Step
Granere v. Dennis et al
as 4:2026cv00050
Plaintiff:
Charles Philip Granere
Defendant:
Timmothy Albert Dennis, Bobby Brown, Lory Quarnberg and others
Unknown:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al.
as 3:2026cv01046
Plaintiff:
Stacey Johnson
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc., Hallcon Crew Transport, Inc., Renzenberger, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
