Cases 91 - 100 of 27,928
Spangler v. Echevarria et al
as 1:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Walter Spangler
Defendant:
Victor Perez Echevarria, Santiago Brothers, Inc. and Progressive Express Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Christopher Gilbert
as 24-6398
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER GILBERT, REANNE KEGLEY, Counselor at ROSP, AMEE DUNCAN, Counselor at ROSP and others
Byline Bank et al v. Wings Air Helicopters LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03489
Plaintiff:
Byline Bank and Community Bank & Trust West Georgia
Defendant:
Wings Air Helicopters LLC, JAD Films Inc, Javier V Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Walter v. Becker-Roscow
as 3:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Walter
Defendant:
Jennifer Becker-Roscow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bridges v. Ward et al
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Bridges
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Warden Walter Berry, Eric Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Meaux et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Xavier McGhee
Defendant:
Chief Investigator Danny Meaux, Judge Robert Arnold, Attorney At Law Gus Sermos and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Charles Walter Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Walters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02023
Plaintiff:
Charity Walters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Julianna Siracusa Rivera, Matthew Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
