Cases 101 - 110 of 9,877
Armer et al v. County of Montgomery et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Selena Reyes, Bruce Armer, Robert Murray and others
Defendant:
County of Montgomery and Shawn J. Bowerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armer et al v. County of Montgomery et al
as NYN/1:24-CV-00259
Plaintiff:
Armer, Selena Reyes, Bruce Armer and others
Defendant:
County of Montgomery and Shawn J. Bowerman
Peterson v. FCI Seagoville et al
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Jua-Deno Peterson, Jr
Defendant:
FCI Seagoville, FNU Rivers, A Greenfeild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Preston #235170 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Nevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. Heaton et al
as 5:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Jason Wade Burnett
Respondent:
Ted Heaton, Paul Kitzke and Clint Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
