Cases 101 - 110 of 31,646
QUIGLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND T. QUIGLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Raymond David v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1773
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAVID
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Hinton et al v. Lund et al
as 2:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hinton, Sr. and Luzvimind Hinton
Defendant:
Betheney Lund, Unknown Lund, EAN Holdings LLC a foreign entity doing business as Enterprise Rent A Car and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ortiz et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Ortiz, Daniel Reichman and Torres Junior Vicente
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. SAMS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Raymond's Auto Repair
as 2:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Raymond's Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conley v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv21603
Plaintiff:
Raymond Conley
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Heft v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HEFT
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Raymond McElroy v. Jonah Beadles, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff:
Raymond McElroy
Defendant:
Jonah Beadles, Deputy Sheriff, Greene County Jail and James Arnott, Sheriff, Greene County Jail
Moore v. Discover Bank
as 1:2024cv03194
Plaintiff:
Shemar Raymond Moore
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
