Cases 101 - 110 of 207
Griffin Jr. v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv03015
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Griffin Jr.
Defendant:
Steve Smith, Steve (I) Smith, Corrections Cable TV Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SISK v. INDIANA et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Defendant:
PAMLA BAILS, BOBBIE BELDEN, CHRISTINE CLEMENS and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SISK
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrahamson v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
John Abrahamson
Defendant:
Steve Smith, Smith Equipment & Truck Sales, LLC, Anytime Towing Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albaugh v. Olson et al
as 2:2013cv00920
Plaintiff:
Anne Albaugh
Defendant:
Mark Olson, Steve Smith and United Safety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taghivand v. Rite Aid Pharmacies et al
as 2:2013cv02497
Plaintiff:
Behrooz Taghivand
Defendant:
Rite Aid Pharmacies and Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-12698
Plaintiff:
Areatha Smith and Steve Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12698
Plaintiff:
Areatha Smith and Steve Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01447
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ambuehl, et al v. Aegis Wholesale, et al
as 13-4068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN AMBUEHL, MARA AMBUEHL, AKA Maria Ambuehl, OLIVER BIGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AEGIS WHOLESALE, AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE, BANK ONE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
