Cases 101 - 110 of 123,856
Alfaro v. Utah County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Samantha Alfaro
Defendant:
Utah County Sheriff's Office, Mike Smith and Chandler Cattelain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Braden Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Covia Smith
as 24-6528
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
COVIA DZELL SMITH, a/k/a Vey
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ABNER, SHANE BOGGS, PATRICK BOWLING and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cantrell v. Brunswick Maine Police, et al
as 24-1522
Plaintiff:
BRICE CANTRELL
Defendant:
BRUNSWICK MAINE POLICE, BRUNSWICK, ME, SCOTT STEWART and others
Smith v. Solorzano
as 2:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Smith
Defendant:
R. Solorzano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv02392
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Smith
Defendant:
Robert Wilson, GNS Trucking Inc., ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Harris v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Byron Harris
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Smith and Kristian Wetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Thompson-Smith et al
as 3:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
John D. Lynch, (II)
Defendant:
Essence Thompson-Smith, Rabee Ratarseh, WoodForest National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joyner v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv03246
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith Joyner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
