Cases 101 - 110 of 2,895
Penton v. Gregory et al
as 4:2023cv04228
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Ashley Gregory, Erin Posey, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Houx v. Fresno County
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Victor Houx
Defendant:
Fresno County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05578
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Commissioner Tyrone Oliver, Randy Sauls and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Network for Victim Recovery of DC (NVRDC) and ACLU of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grande v. State of MN et al
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Grande
Defendant:
State of MN, Saint Peter Regional Treatment Center and State of MN Dept. of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winston v. Shah et al
as 4:2023cv04224
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Viper Shah, . Savage, . Shawgo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
as 5:2024ct03026
Plaintiff:
Darrel R. Fisher
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Valdivia v. Fresno County
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
John Valdivia
Defendant:
Fresno County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUBOSE et al v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE and ABDUSH DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Penton v. Haq et al
as 4:2023cv04212
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Yasir Haq, . Tinwalla, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
