Cases 111 - 120 of 3,969
Gillings v. Manhattan North Management Company, Inc.
as 1:2023cv10453
Plaintiff:
Shaka Gillings
Defendant:
Manhattan North Management Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
FEARS v. EDENFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
TRACI LYNN FEARS
Defendant:
DONNIE EDENFIELD, MELCHER and LAWRENCE GILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Gill et al v. Cauthorn et al
as 3:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Gill and Kimberly Elliott
Defendant:
City-Parish of East Baton Rouge, Town of Addis, David Lee Cauthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv10259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alder Holdings LLC v. Gilles
as 2:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
Alder Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Edriss Gilles
Cousins v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ross Cousins
Defendant:
Col. Eric Young, Sgt. Caplinger, Officer O. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Gill v. Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gill
Defendant:
Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc. and Northwell Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
