Cases 111 - 120 of 477
David Whitehead v. USDC-CALA
as 19-71906
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD
Not Yet Classified:
JP MORGAN, LIONSGATE HOME ENTERTAINMENT, WALT DISNEY COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID LOUIS WHITEHEAD
Dickerson v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2019cv01126
Defendant:
John Does 1-15, City of Portland and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Mark Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couri v. Pavia
as 19-2260
Defendant / Appellee:
UW Hospital, Paul Wooten, JSC/Kings, Riverside County District Attorney Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Couri
Gomez v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2019cv02412
Defendant:
Officer Vincent Macaraeg, City of Memphis, Tennessee, John Doe 1-15 and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Amy D Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David Louis Whitehead v. Netflix Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05500
Defendant:
MGM INC, JP Morgan, UNNAMED DEWAYNE WICKHAM and others
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GONCALVES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2019cv13922
Plaintiff:
MARIA GONCALVES
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-15, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ABC COS 1-15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Ensor v. John Does 1-15
as 1:2019cv00625
Defendant:
John Does 1-15
Plaintiff:
Elyse Ensor
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PREZIOSI v. JETSMARTER, INC et al
as 3:2019cv13627
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PREZIOSI
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-15, JETSMARTER, INC and MATT YOKLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PREZIOSI v. JETSMARTER, INC et al
as 2:2019cv13627
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PREZIOSI
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-15, JETSMARTER, INC and MATT YOKLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Couri v. Pavia et al
as 1:2019cv05436
Defendant:
ADA Garrett Behrens, Sulmeyer Kupetz, Dan Angers and others
Plaintiff:
James Couri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
