Cases 111 - 120 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Hadley Auto Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv09470
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Hadley Auto Transport, Inc., Dionne Marlene Taylor and Dionne Marlene Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00534
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Director
as 6:2007cv00524
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
TDCJ-ID Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson et al v. Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority et al
as 5:2007cv05667
Plaintiff:
Lee Jackson and Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority, Silicon Valley Animal Control Authority, City of Santa Clara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Richard et al
as 3:2007cv00962
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Maria R. Richard and Safeco Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jackson v. Moore et al
as 1:2007cv04864
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Moore, Taylor, Punches and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2007cv00192
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Jackson v. Robert A Horel
as 2:2007cv02044
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jackson
Respondent:
Robert A Horel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company
as 9:2007cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jackson
Defendant:
Carolina Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
