Cases 111 - 120 of 124
Robinson et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2010cv01046
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson , Flazell Redfield , Richard Ross and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Cargile v. Ross et al
as 2:2010cv00307
Plaintiff:
Brett Allen Cargile
Defendant:
Richard Ross, Rickey Allum, Terry Purdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v State of Florida
as 1:2010cv20633
Petitioner:
Richard Ross
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSS v STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2010cv00032
Petitioner:
RICHARD ROSS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Ross et al
as 2:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
Diego Ross
Defendant:
Richard - Ross and Juana Ross
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ross v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00245
Plaintiff:
Richard Ross
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ross v. Astrue
as 2:2008mi00031
Plaintiff:
Richard Ross
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustees of the Roanoke Iron Workers Pension Fund et al v. B&M Steel Erectors, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00498
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Roanoke Iron Workers Pension Fund, Trustees of the Roanoke Iron Workers Trust Fund, Trustees of the Mid-Atlantic States District Council Participating Locals Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
B&M Steel Erectors, Inc. and Michael Reed
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BOYD et al v. TIMCHO et al
as 2:2007cv02855
Plaintiff:
AARON BOYD, SHONI BOYD, SHERRON BOYD and others
Defendant:
EDWARD TIMCHO, SHE-HEAN CARTER, JOHN KHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
