Cases 111 - 120 of 197
Montini v. Lawler et al
as 1:2012cv11296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Montini
Defendant:
Joseph C. Lawler, Steven G. Crane, Francis J. Jules and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CGI Finance, Inc. v. Johnson
as 1:2012cv01895
Plaintiff:
CGI FINANCE, INC.
Defendant:
Thomas W Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Flagstar Bank, FSB
as 2:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Johnson and Emily R Johnson
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Johnson v. Rogers et al
as 4:2012cv04029
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Johnson
Defendant:
Anne Paige Rogers, Mary E. Rogers, Kevin Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Johnson v. M. Martel, et al
as 12-55591
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS DEWAYNE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
M. MARTEL, Warden and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real Party In Interest
Hicks et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 5:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Oscar H Hicks, Jr , Hubert H Raborn , Richmond H Dunbar and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Niese et al v. ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC. et al
as 1:2012cv00555
Plaintiff:
William A. Niese , James R. Simpson , Thomas W. Johnson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC., Associated Bank, N.A. , Amalgamated Bank Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 0:2012cv00172
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Johnson
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
USA v. Thomas Johnson
as 12-50021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS DEMETRIOUS JOHNSON
Nelson et al v. Decor-Tec, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv00098
Plaintiff:
Terry Nelson , John Nesse , Clark Anderson and others
Defendant:
Decor-Tec, Inc. and Thomas F. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
