Cases 121 - 130 of 1,021
Ryan Dobbs v. Health IQ Insurance Services Inc
as 22-2588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN DOBBS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
HEALTH IQ INSURANCE SERVICES INC
Dobbs v. Messer
as 5:2022cv03182
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
Fernando Messer
Interested Party:
Jack Laurie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbs v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Michael Dobbs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BOATRIGHT v. DOBBS
as 1:2022cv01685
Petitioner:
JOHN BOATRIGHT
Respondent:
DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbs v. Morrisey O'Donnell et al
as 3:2022cv01224
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Dobbs
Defendant:
Sheriff Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell and Derrick Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DOBBS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15160
Plaintiff:
TOMMIE LEE DOBBS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
as 5:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dobbs v. Noll et al
as 5:2022cv03163
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
Jesse Noll and Veronica Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Molina v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2022cv22487
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Alfonso Molina
Defendant:
B. Dobbs, R. Cutlip, Peter Hanna and others
Dobbs v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Avery Dobbs
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Atchison County Sheriff's Department, Jesse Noll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
