Cases 131 - 140 of 954
Schleyer et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2022cv10932
Plaintiff:
Eric Schleyer and Emilyn Mishkan
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Scarborough v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Brittni Scarborough
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv08149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Diaz v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 4:2022cv07625
Plaintiff:
Andrea Diaz
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Mariko Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
JENNINGS v. LYONS MAGNUS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
JOANNE JENNINGS
Defendant:
LYONS MAGNUS, LLC, TRU ASEPTICS, LLC, STARBUCKS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Poor v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2022cv07255
Petitioner:
Teresa Poor
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Interested Party:
Workers United, Justin Wooster, Joselyn Chuquillanqui and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Kerwin v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2022cv12761
Petitioner:
Regional Director Elizabeth K. Kerwin
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
Workers United
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
