Cases 141 - 150 of 245
D'Orsa Dijamco v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 0:2013cv62432
Plaintiff:
Patricia E. D'Orsa Dijamco
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Administration , Sheldon J. Burkett and Kimberly Y. Elliot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McAlphin v. Obi et al
as 2:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
James McAlphin
Defendant:
N Obi, Ball, G Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv00715
Petitioner:
Anthony Edwards
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, P. A. Hadded, E. D. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLEMAN v. WILSON
as 1:2013cv01434
Petitioner:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Respondent:
E. D. WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
World Fuel Services, Inc. v. E & D Citgo, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05273
Plaintiff:
World Fuel Services, Inc.
Defendant:
E & D Citgo, Inc., Austin & Montrose, Inc. and Evripidis ("Evris") Gogos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Davenport et al v. Hingham School Committee et al
as 1:2013cv11735
Plaintiff:
Patrick Davenport , Joan Davenport and E. D.
Defendant:
Hingham School Committee , Hingham Public Schools , Town of Hingham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Griffin v. Wilson
as 2:2013cv00338
Petitioner:
Scott Tremayne Griffin
Respondent:
E. D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Castro v. Wilson
as 1:2013cv00675
Petitioner:
Juan E. Castro
Respondent:
E. D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Strouse v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv00323
Petitioner:
James Strouse
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, E. D. Wilson, Dho Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
