Cases 151 - 160 of 228
William Clark v. M. Cheeseboro
as 12-6670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM BILL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CHEESEBORO, Sargeant/H.R.R.J., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SIMMONS, Corr.Officer at H.R.R.J., SGT. WARD, Sargeant at H.R.R.J. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Herndon v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv02087
Plaintiff:
Timmy Herndon
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, William Bill Oldham, Linda Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deleon v. Hoffman
as 12-475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Isidoro Deleon
Defendant - Appellee:
Elizabeth Hoffman, Donna Reinhardt, Faith VanDaley and others
Gibson v. Gibson et al
as 3:2012cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Gibson
Defendant:
Katrina G. Gibson, William "Bill" Watkins, George Trabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
BRENT BOYD, MARGENE ADKINS, FRED ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBOZA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00890
Petitioner:
WILLIAM "BILL" BARBOZA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
McKaughan v. Haslam et al
as 2:2011cv03085
Plaintiff:
Coy Robb McKaughan
Defendant:
Bill Haslam, Shelby County, Tennessee, Mark H. Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keppler v. Haslam et al
as 3:2011cv01040
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles (Rob) Keppler, III
Defendant:
William Edward (Bill) Haslam, William (Bill) Gibbons, Steven G. Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Adkins
as 7:2011cv00490
Defendant:
Lt. Adkins
Plaintiff:
William Bill Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
